摘要
目的:研究表明,高强度间歇训练在改善冠心病患者心肺功能方面可能优于中等强度持续训练,但高强度间歇训练的临床疗效仍存在争议。此次研究旨在系统评估高强度间歇训练与中等强度持续训练对冠心病患者临床疗效的影响。方法:通过检索中国...展开更多
目的:研究表明,高强度间歇训练在改善冠心病患者心肺功能方面可能优于中等强度持续训练,但高强度间歇训练的临床疗效仍存在争议。此次研究旨在系统评估高强度间歇训练与中等强度持续训练对冠心病患者临床疗效的影响。方法:通过检索中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science等数据库,选择高强度间歇训练、中等强度持续训练应用于冠心病心脏康复有关的随机对照试验,使用Review Manager 5.3及Stata MP 17软件对最终纳入的文献进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10篇文献,包括786例患者。Meta分析结果显示,高强度间歇训练组峰值摄氧量、第一通气阈时摄氧量均高于中等强度持续训练组[MD=1.30,95%CI(0.71,1.89),P0.05)。结论:相较于中等强度持续训练,高强度间歇训练在改善冠心病患者峰值摄氧量及第一通气阈时摄氧量方面更有优势,而对静息心率、峰值心率、静息收缩压、静息舒张压无明显影响。收起
OBJECTIVE:Although existing studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training may be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training in improving cardiopulmonary function in patients with coronary heart disease,its clinical efficacy remains controv...MORE
OBJECTIVE:Although existing studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training may be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training in improving cardiopulmonary function in patients with coronary heart disease,its clinical efficacy remains controversial.Therefore,this meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with coronary heart disease.METHODS:Randomized controlled trials of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in cardiac rehabilitation of coronary heart disease were included by searching Chinese and English databases such as CNKI,WanFang Database,Wipro,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,and Web of science.Meta-analysis of the final included literature was performed using Review Manager 5.3 and StataMP 17.RESULTS:A total of 10 studies met the study criteria and included 773 patients.Compared with moderate-intensity continuous training,high-intensity interval training resulted in higher peak oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake at the first ventilatory threshold were higher[mean difference=1.30,95%confidence interval(0.71,1.89),P0.05).CONCLUSION:Compared with moderate-intensity continuous training,high-intensity interval training is more advantageous in improving peak oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake at the first ventilation threshold in coronary artery disease,while has no significant effects on resting heart rate,peak heart rate,resting systolic blood pressure,and resting diastolic blood pressure.FEWER
作者
胡玉洁
谢萍
卢维杰
杨康
邓耀庭
刘梦洋
Hu Yujie;Xie Ping;Lu Weijie;Yang Kang;Deng Yaoting;Liu Mengyang(The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu Province,China;Guansu Provincial People’s Hospital,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu Province,China;Gansu University of Chinese Medicine,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu Province,China)
出处
《中国组织工程研究》
CAS
北大核心
2026年第10期2584-2593,共10页
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金
甘肃中医药大学创新创业项目(2025CXZX-917),项目负责人:卢维杰。
关键词
冠心病
高强度间歇训练
中等强度持续训练
心脏康复
临床疗效
随机对照研究
Meta分析
coronary heart disease
high-intensity interval exercise
moderate-intensity aerobic exercise
cardiac rehabilitation
clinical efficacy
randomized controlled trial
meta-analysis